🎧 Prefer to listen? Hit play to hear this blog read aloud.
As trauma becomes better understood across disciplines, the legal system is beginning to recognize the importance of adapting its processes to reduce harm. For survivors of sexual assault, abuse, or other traumatic experiences, legal proceedings can often feel like a continuation of the trauma itself. But there is a growing movement within the legal profession that aims to change this.
Trauma-informed lawyering offers a way forward - one that prioritizes empathy, reduces re-traumatization, and supports both empathy and justice.
This blog explores how legal professionals can adopt trauma-informed practices, how trauma affects memory and testimony, and why understanding these dynamics is essential for achieving ethical and effective outcomes.
Trauma-informed lawyering is the practice of recognizing the impact of trauma on a survivor's behaviour, memory, and communication - and responding with practices that minimize harm. Rather than focusing solely on legal outcomes, trauma-informed legal strategies consider the emotional and psychological safety of the survivor throughout the process.
A trauma-informed lawyer:
This approach is not only more compassionate - it’s often more effective. Survivors who feel respected and safe are better able to participate meaningfully in the legal process.
Here are several real-world strategies that have been used in civil cases involving trauma, including sexual assault and personal injury claims:
Ongoing communication with opposing counsel can surface survivor-specific needs, such as gender preferences for mediators or specific accommodations that may reduce distress. Honouring these preferences can contribute to earlier resolutions and more humane proceedings.
Instead of requiring survivors to recount traumatic experiences aloud, some legal professionals use written admissions or allow plaintiffs to review claims in silence. One lawyer asked a survivor to silently confirm details by reading their civil claim, avoiding unnecessary verbal repetition of trauma.
Accommodations such as allowing a support animal or trusted family member to be present during mediation can help the survivor feel grounded and emotionally supported. Selecting mediators with a trauma-informed background and adjusting the environment (e.g., room layout, pacing, gender of mediator) can make a significant difference.
In some cases, survivors prioritize non-financial outcomes, such as apologies, policy changes, or institutional accountability measures. Trauma-informed lawyering supports these broader goals, aligning legal outcomes with personal desires.
Modifying courtroom procedures, for example, allowing testimony from behind a screen or relying on agreed statements of fact, can reduce re-traumatization. In one example, a survivor was granted to provide testimony behind a screen in the courtroom so that they did not have to see the defendant.
These strategies benefit everyone involved: survivors, legal counsel, and the justice system. They foster trust, support clarity, and reduce the emotional toll of litigation.
To practice trauma-informed lawyering, it’s essential to understand how trauma affects memory and communication. Survivors of trauma often experience flashbacks, dissociation, or freeze responses when faced with reminders of their trauma - including legal procedures.
Here are key trauma responses that may emerge in legal contexts:
Traumatic memories are often fragmented, sensory-driven, and involuntary. Survivors may feel as though the traumatic event is happening in the present moment. For example, a survivor might see their abuser’s face overlaid on someone else’s, or feel physical sensations (like blood or pressure) during a flashback.
Everyday stimuli, a particular smell, posture, or facial expression, can act as powerful triggers. One survivor described panicking when lying down at night, as it reminded them of a past assault. Providing neutral environments and accommodations can help to reduce these triggers.
A survivor may genuinely struggle to access or communicate memories during cross-examination due to trauma-related memory disruption. In a courtroom or assessment setting, this can be misinterpreted as avoidance or unreliability. This doesn’t reflect dishonesty, but rather the neurological impact of trauma on the brain's ability to retrieve and verbalize events under stress.
Recognizing these responses for what they are - physiological reactions, not evasions - is critical. Trauma-informed strategies improve both the survivor’s experience and the integrity of the legal process.
Over 64% of Canadian adults report experiencing at least one traumatic event, with women disproportionately affected by sexual trauma. The adversarial nature of traditional legal systems can intensify harm, creating an urgent need for trauma-informed reform.
Trauma-informed lawyering:
As one expert put it: a trauma-informed court is a just court.
At MindSense, we advocate for trauma-informed systems - not just in medical assessments, but across all sectors that interact with survivors. Legal professionals play a powerful role in shaping the survivor’s experience of justice. By adopting trauma-informed strategies, lawyers can be part of a broader shift toward healing justice: a system that acknowledges harm, empowers survivors, and pursues accountability with compassion.
We encourage lawyers and legal professionals to continue exploring resources such as professional training, research, podcasts, and legal writing guides that promote safe, respectful, and equitable practice.
Looking to integrate trauma-informed strategies into your legal work?
MindSense offers expert-led medical assessments that align with trauma-informed legal practices across Canada. Contact us to learn how we can support your work, and the survivors you serve.